Skip to main content

The Euro, Café, and Personal History

Photo by Fotosipsak of iStock Photo
While living in Spain, I learned volumes about history by talking to individuals whose stories will never appear in a history book or program.


I'll never forget hearing a friend tell me what it was like to survive the poverty of the posguerra (the years immediately after the civil war) in southeastern Spain. "A neighbor of ours slaughtered a hog," she told me, "and  shared it with my family. I hadn't eaten in a week, though, and after eating the meal we made from the hog, I threw it all up, and was soon hungry again." 


I happened to be in Spain during another transition, though not a violent one. It was an economic transition, the coming of the euro. I remember vividly the public service announcements on how to calculate the value of pesetas to euros. In fact, Doña Letizia herself presented many of those PSAs in her pre-princesa days.


I dreaded the change. A conversion formula of 1,68 pesetas per Euro was not something I could figure in my head. In spite of the contrasting rims, the denominations on the euro coins were harder for me to differentiate from each other than the former Spanish coins had been. It was too easy to drop the wrong amount in a machine or give erroneous change to someone. Yet, these problems were mere discomforts compared to the major problem the Euro stealthily brought to Spain's economy.


Photo by Kenni Caraballo, of iStock Photo
With the change to the euro, countless businesses and corporations raised prices. Pre-euro a delicious, rejuvenating cup of Spanish coffee cost 50 pesetas. Suddenly, it cost 1 euro; technically 1,68 pesetas.  Soon, it was 1,5 euros in many places, and friends in Spain tell me now you can pay more than that for coffee. 


Take that little coffee price maneuver and transfer it to: food, utilities, housing, transportation .... and remember that--¡surprise!--salaries did not share this rounding-up move that accompanied the euros Spaniards now had to spend.  Salaries stayed static. 


I can't speak to what happened in other European countries, but I'd have no trouble believing that rounding up of prices and expenses happened in other euro zone countries, as well.


When I hear reports about the euro zone, cynicism rises within me. Yes, people in their respective countries voted to join the euro zone, but these votes were based on information regarding increased future prosperity and security. The opposite is what took place. My cynicism also remembers NAFTA. Much of the information regarding NAFTA was like the information regarding the euro: much more projection and conjecture than proven, dependable information. Watch one half-hour of news from Mexico and ask yourself what in the world did NAFTA do? For that matter, watch the US economic news, and ask the same question.


I pay close attention to economic news (I'm a big fan of Nightly Business Report, Marketplace, and The Economist) and try my best to understand the "big stuff," the financial trends, bank bailouts, exports / imports, trade deficits and surpluses, but I didn't need to know any of that to know that the euro was going to be a big problem for lots of people, such a big problem that it now affects economies far outside the euro zone. All I needed was to buy a cup of coffee that, from one day to the next, had jumped 30 percent in price.


Strangely, the euro now looks to be as difficult to digest for many Europeans as that plate of pork was for my friend in those terrible conditions many years ago.

Comments

Jeff Damron said…
A fantastic essay, Ysabel. I cancelled my subscription to the Economist recently for 2 reasons - (1) each issue is so jam-packed with information I never read more than a tiny fraction; (2) my issue typically arrived only a day or so before the next issue hit the stands (if only there were "stands" where I live). But it provides a worldview that is hard to get anywhere else here in the US. I try to compensate by listening more to BBC news on my car's Sirius radio. The reporting is good in the Economist, on BBC and NPR, but the "news" itself is seldom good it seems.
Yes, I have put myself on a news diet. I like the Economist, because it tends to put economic conditions in a broader context, and I simply enjoy the good writing. Still, there are article in there that make my eyes glaze over and I think, so what? all this will be different by the next issue! Ha!

Glad you liked the essay.

Popular posts from this blog

Life without Television, Part 2

I began life without television with relief, which was consistent Monday through Friday. The first few weekends, though, felt awkward, anxious, lonely. When PBS has good programming on Saturday nights, it is extraordinarily good. Father Brown, Phryne Fisher, New Tricks... Extraordinary acting, high production values, and I fantasize about the pudgy, brilliant priest just perhaps having an innocent crush on one of his special parishioners, which would be moi. 

I called a friend one Sunday. "Maybe television helped with my anxiety more than I realized," I said. She told me about her aunt who, after her husband's death, kept the television on in his "man cave" 24/7. He has been gone years now. The television goes on, everlasting, in his absence. I don't blame her. Much of my frequent and prolonged television viewing began with grief.

After my sister died, I would watch almost anything, especially late at night when sleep eluded me. I even watched Convoy with …

Whose day?

Years ago, I made some collages using pages from a desk calendar from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The image that leads this post is one. Inside the hearts and flowers is a picture from the MMA collection of  a Japanese screen made in the 16th century. It is titled Tagasode, which means Whose sleeves?  The title comes from a 10th-century poem:


The fragrance seems even more alluring than the hue, Whose sleeves have brushed past? Or would it be this plum tree blossoming here at home?
Iro yori mo ka koso awaredo omohoyure tagasode fureshi ado no ume zo mo
The word haunts: tagasode. Whose sleeves? The question floats in my mind like a cloud on a still day. The sleeves materialize in my mind's eye. I hear them move through hushed air. I can imagine, though not name, the scent of the person to whom those sleeves belong. It's not unlike smelling the scent of your infant's clothes, or holding the perfume bottle that belonged to your mother...you don't need to open it... you know tha…

Glad to Hear It

This past week, Larry Wilmore and company mentioned Rachel Dolezol again on The Nightly Show. I don't remember who made the comment, but either Wilmore or one of the panelists said, "Did Rachel Dolezol do anything bad? No, she really didn't. Why did we get so uptight about that?" I was glad to hear it. Three cheers for being human.

I looked briefly at what's on Google currently about her and the now much-discussed Shaun White. I intend not to enter any of that fray mentally or verbally. I still maintain that humanity trumps color. We have a long way to go until we can leave our "paint by numbers" mentality behind, but we've made progress. Good changes can come, even in the midst of chaos and controversy. Maybe White and Dolezal will help us see that eventually.

As long as I'm here and continuing on the subject of color, I think I'm not alone in the fact that I don't like being called "white." As for my background, it includes …