Skip to main content

Limits, limitations and line

Rights are big news this week.

Case one: Shepard Fairey. Very creative guy, with good design skills and a talent for creative synthesis. He put that talent to work, however, on subject matter he neither created, owned or had permission to use. That's wrong. Fairey also installs / posts art in public places without permission. Also wrong. Y punto. I don't know why this is even making it to talk shows. Yes, it was a fantastic poster. And it was an illegal production. (As is, ultimately, that Che Guevarra t-shirt you have in your drawer.) If I take a denim jacket from your closet, glue fake gemstones to it, and then wear it to go two-stepping one Saturday night, that does not make the jacket mine.

The fact that there is so much buzz on this issue makes an important statement about our lives today in the weblectronic world. We can get our hands on lots of "cool stuff" now. I can download a Picasso, copy and paste a forwarded emailed poem that the last sender forgot to put the author's name on, and co-opt someone's article to create a video script. The last was done to me, in fact, in a very nice video about the photographer Ortiz-Echagüe. The "producer" didn't even bother to contact me to ask my permission, which I would have gladly given. She did, at least, give me a credit line. Still, a credit line does not a permission make.

We need to remember that it's never been easier than it is today to find people to ask their permission to use their work. I've had great luck with the process and really nice responses from people I asked for permissions from. Not to ask their permission is lazy and wrong, y punto. If you can't get permission, make your own image. Create, don't just synthesize.


Case 2: GoogleBooks. I did a search on DreamBones and found 32 pages of the book in Google Books. Google Books did not ask my permission, and I'm the copyright holder. They didn't even notify me to let me know it was posted. I might have been able to use the large online excerpt as a promotional tool if I'd known of its existence. But, marketing for a book for which I hold the copyright should be based on my decisions, my selections, and not that of a corporation that has no personal connection with me whatsoever.

The Author's Guild is to be commended (and praised, cheered, and appreciated) for their Herculean effort in bringing Google into Limits Land on this issue. It's not right to put (aka publish) other people's books on line, in whole or in part, and then say all is well because the words "Copyrighted Material" are in the bottom right-hand corner of each page. For details on the resolution of this problem, click here

If you own a a dog, does any other person have the right to come pick up your pet and take it for a walk without your permission? Why should it, how can it possibly be ethical or permissible to "pick up" someone's created work and take it for a walk wherever one pleases, without even informing the author--or artist, composer, seamstress, etc.?

The internet is a wonderful creation. But the web needs limits in order for it to keep the shape of its worldwide usefulness. Picasso expressed this concept well. He advised painters to create a large painting, using only one brush, and not to switch sizes or shapes until the painting was done. He believed that this limitation would enhance, if not enforce, the painter's creativity, and at the same time, lend the work an underlying consistency and structure.

Creating means you start from scratch, from zero. Collaborating--which is also creative--means you communicate with your co-creators when you need to and ought to. Let's keep creating. Let's talk to and work with each other. Let's not have limitations, but yes, let's do have limits.

And remember:
A single line can give rise to an infinity of forms.


Image 1: Conversation with Scottie on a Sunny Afternoon
Image 2: Cover of DreamBones, painting by Mil Lubroth
Image 3: A three-dimensional line, Minneapolis Sculpture Garden
Text and images, copyright Ysabel de la Rosa, 2009.

Comments

Hi Ysabel,
I saw some of my photos on Google Images the other day and have no idea how they got there. Have tried to find the info but to no avail. I don't have a Creative Commons License which allows sharing. Even though it says that the images 'May have a copyright' I still don't want them on there. Very perplexing. Nothing's safe anymore! Thanks for this important post!
Catherine
The images are a different matter. Any image you publish on your blog or on any website can appear in a google image search. Once you click on the image, it will take the searcher to your blog, for example, if that's where the image is posted. In this case, Google is not "republishing" the image as they are with the books, but just using it as a content search function. The only way you could avoid it is not to put photos on your blog and PLEASE do not do that! The photos are too wonderful!

Popular posts from this blog

Mil Cosas

Mil Lubroth was an American artist of Polish and Russian descent who came to settle in Madrid, where her chic, short name took on an extra meaning. In castellano, Mil means a thousand. Just right for an artist whose work could never be "pinned down," or categorized by any one theme or direction.

To experience Lubroth's work is akin to hearing a chorus of voices from Sheherazade's 1001 nights: it is to see and feel a thousand things united in one intriguing and beautiful visual journey. If you are anywhere near Madrid during October, invite yourself to a banquet of Mil's "mil cosas" atAnnta Gallery. The exhibit that opens October 5th is the first retrospective of Lubroth's work since her death in 2004.

Spanning 50 years, these works reveal an artist who was never less than mature and skilled in her work. There is no sign of awkward beginnings, improvement over time or deepening development. Here is Minerva, beginning her artistic trajectory fully f…

Booked on Sugar

Sometimes the television remote control finds the channel for Destiny. I believe I was indeed destined to see Marc Aronson'sand Marina Buddhos's presentation to students at the Brooklyn Public Library based on their recent book, SugarChanged the World. Their program certainly changed my world. While written for a youth audience, this is a book that adults will enjoy, and naturally, a great book for parents to share with their children.

I often wonder at the parallels between drug addiction and food addiction in our culture. I know I'm not alone in this. You can't miss the similarities:  "Betcha can't eat just one.  Crave the crunch. Do you dream in chocolate? Hershey chocolate is bliss."  And, as noted in my earlier posts on  Super Bowl ads, when you see a man "snorting" Dorito crumbs .... well, I rest my case.

I've also thought about how quickly we "judge" people with substance abuse problems while the US clearly suffers from foo…

A Cat, a Dog, and Shakespeare: The Perfect Sunday Afternoon

One reason I keep paying a cable bill is to be able to watch Turner Classic Movies. I had just finished a batch of Sunday chores and was resting a moment on the couch, wedged between Chatterly the cat and Gypsy the dog (an Australian Kelpie), and saw that TCM was about to air Julius Caesar, directed by Joseph Mankiewicz, and produced in 1953. 


I read Julius Caesar for the first time when I was in sixth grade. It was a great time to read it, because it seemed fresh and real to me, even though some of the centuries-old English was challenging. 


The movie made me wish that Joseph Mankiewicz had directed more of Shakespeare's works for cinema. The balance the movie strikes is oh, so totally just right. It does not go so far into cinematic territory that we lose the work's theatricality, but travels far enough by camera that it provides a sense of seamless reality only a movie can create.  The casting was brilliant.  James Mason was at his best as Brutus, and he carries the film on h…