Skip to main content

Of Englishes and Emilies


George Bernard Shaw remarked that Great Britain and the United States were two countries divided by a common language. I'm reminded of this most when an English English speaker (or in some cases an Australian English speaker) living in the U.S. tells me that Americans don't know how to speak "proper" English. This happens to me with strangers and non-strangers alike. Most notable among my experiences was a British librarian working in our local public library who told me she was suffering from not having enough good things to read in this country, while she stood surrounded by thousands and thousands of books. (I asked her if she had read any Doris Lessing lately. "No," she replied. "I'm not familiar with her.")

Having been told again, just last week, how "horrible" American English is, I've been giving the subject of multiple Englishes more thought than usual. It's a topic I like thinking about, one that usually makes me smile inside. First, I wonder if the people who tell me that Americans don't speak "properly," have any idea how awful we Americans would sound if we tried to master those far-ranging, wide-open vowels of yours, or that wide span of clipped or lilting cadences? You would beg us to go back to speaking "American," I'm afraid. Second, the differences are so much fun, I wouldn't want to lose them. It stretches my mind to think of a word as soft as lorry serving for the one-syllable punch of truck. And fun to think of the loo as the lieu where, well, you know. And the cue for a line in a play that sounds like the queue that is the line stretching out the door of the theater--or the theatre. On the other hand, to my American ears, bloke seems a harsh-sounding thing to call a fellow or even a "guy," and I cannot figure out why, in a BBC newscast full of soft, round ah-sounds and impeccable enunciation, the anchorman reporting on the Middle East suddenly pronounces Hamas as Ham-ass.

We have the British to thank, though, for not instituting an official Academy of the Language à la France. Perhaps we needed one, as Jonathan Swift believed. But, as Samuel Johnson wrote, "Sounds are too volatile and subtile for legal restraints; to enchain syllables and to lash the wind are equally the undertakings of pride." English remains rebellious, rich, rocking and soothing, wherever it is spoken or written. It remains the only language in the world that actually sounds good when spoken with a foreign accent. Such flexibility translates into great linguistic power. Such flexibility breeds freedom.

As one small effort to make the case for our two Englishes, I turn to two Emilies, Brontë and Dickinson, masters each of their respective English tongues.

Brontë's poetry is as light and full as a dappled grey cloud sailing across the moors. She adds whatever is needed--syllable, cadence, or rhyme--to keep her poem's story rolling, propelled in a way that feels oceanic or wind-driven. Yet her addition is not overdo but artistry, linguistic music, a flourish that feeds. American English has repeatedly done away with this tradition of addition, decade by decade, sometimes to our loss.


Dickinson's poetry is also light, but sharp, with a presence at once classical and contemporary. Whether she aimed to do so or not, she introduced a native American Haiku-ness into English language poetry in a way never done before or since. Not an imitation of Haiku, not syllable counting, but diving into the pared-down, core-of-the-heart-and-mind character that hides beneath the surface in English. She avoids addition and lays things bare, but with craft and skill.

One adds and builds, one pares and strips. Both arrive at meaning and beauty. Take a look at their work, and tell me, would you trade one for the other? Neither would I!

Vive les différences--all those differences that remind us of the rich treasure-full language that we share, that great, old, new language that continues to be bigger than all of us.

Emily Jane Brontë, 1818-1848. Yorkshire, England

D8
I gazed upon the cloudless moon,
And loved her all the night,
Till morning came and radiant noon
And I forgot her light--

No, not forgot--eternally
Remains its memory dear;
But could the day seem dark to me
Because the night was fair?



A5 #116
Fair sinks the summer evening now
in softened glory round my home;
The sky upon its holy brow
Wears not a cloud that speaks of gloom.

The old tower, shrined in golden light,
Looks down on the descending sun--
So gently evening blends with night,
You scarce can say that day is done.



A9 #148
Aye, there it is! It wakes to-night
Sweet thoughts that will not die
And feeling's fires flash all as bright
As in the years gone by!

And I can tell by thine altered cheek
And by thy kindled gaze
And by the words thou scarce dost speak,
How wildly fancy plays.

Yes, I could swear that glorious wind
Has swept the world aside,
Has dashed its memory from thy mind
Like foam-bells from the tide--

And thou art now a spirit pouring
Thy presence into all--
The essence of the Tempest's roaring
And of the Tempest's fall--

A universal influence
From Thine own influence free;
A principle of life, intense,
Lost to mortality.

Thus truly when that breast is cold
Thy prisoned soul shall rise,
The dungeon mingle with the mould--
The captive with the skies.


Emily Elizabeth Dickinson, 1830-1886. Amherst, Massachussetts

1016
The Hills in Purple syllables
The Day's Adventures tell
To little Groups of Continents
Just going Home from School.


668
"Nature" is what we see --
The Hill -- the Afternoon --
Squirrel -- Eclipse -- the Bumble bee
Nay -- Nature is Heaven --
Nature is what we hear --
The Bobolink -- the Sea --
Thunder -- the Cricket --
Nay--Nature is Harmony--
Nature is what we know --
Yet have no art to say --
So impotent our Wisdom is
To her Simplicity


269
Danger is not at first,
for then we are unconscious,
but in the after--slower--Days--

Love is its own rescue,
for we--at our supremest,
are but its trembling Emblems--

________________________________________

Sources: The Complete Poems of Emily Jane Brontë. Columbia University Press, 1941, C.W. Hatfield, ed. The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. Little Brown and Company, 1960. Thomas H. Johnson, Ed. New Poems of Emily Dickinson. The University of North Carolina Press, 1993. William H. Shurr, Anna Dunlap, Emily Grey Shurr, eds. Post copyright Ysabel de la Rosa, 2006.

Comments

Sinto Carlos said…
Right on, Ysabel.

I'm English English. I enjoy the differences and agree that these make it a rich and interesting language.

I don't understand the people who tell you that Americans don't speak "properly"; are they not aware of all the dialects and accents with which English is spoken? I have been 200 miles from home in my own country and had to have the locals translated for me by a friend who'd been there a week ('thees' and 'thous' abounded).
The same thing occurs here within a few hundred miles, as well. One of the funniest illustrations of this is a little exercise where you pronounce the words stock, stark, stack, and stork in front of the word naked. While the correctly spelled version is "stark naked," stock sounds American South, stack American Boston-area, and stork is pure Texan.
Sinto Carlos said…
I just read something which helps me to understand why these people might make such comments on American English.

In a book deconstructing websites, the authors write:

"...does the top cart do the same or something else?

Too, it's strange to offer 'Proceed to Checkout' when there is nothing in the cart. Also, 'No Items in the Cart' is not quite as clear as..."

I believe an English English speaker would never use that 'Too': though an American English speaker can.

But to say one use is 'correct' and another not in something as many-tentacled and continually evolving as this language, is a bit precious. And if it's not correct English that's spoken, what is it you speak: patois?

Popular posts from this blog

Mil Cosas

Mil Lubroth was an American artist of Polish and Russian descent who came to settle in Madrid, where her chic, short name took on an extra meaning. In castellano, Mil means a thousand. Just right for an artist whose work could never be "pinned down," or categorized by any one theme or direction.

To experience Lubroth's work is akin to hearing a chorus of voices from Sheherazade's 1001 nights: it is to see and feel a thousand things united in one intriguing and beautiful visual journey. If you are anywhere near Madrid during October, invite yourself to a banquet of Mil's "mil cosas" atAnnta Gallery. The exhibit that opens October 5th is the first retrospective of Lubroth's work since her death in 2004.

Spanning 50 years, these works reveal an artist who was never less than mature and skilled in her work. There is no sign of awkward beginnings, improvement over time or deepening development. Here is Minerva, beginning her artistic trajectory fully f…

A Cat, a Dog, and Shakespeare: The Perfect Sunday Afternoon

One reason I keep paying a cable bill is to be able to watch Turner Classic Movies. I had just finished a batch of Sunday chores and was resting a moment on the couch, wedged between Chatterly the cat and Gypsy the dog (an Australian Kelpie), and saw that TCM was about to air Julius Caesar, directed by Joseph Mankiewicz, and produced in 1953. 


I read Julius Caesar for the first time when I was in sixth grade. It was a great time to read it, because it seemed fresh and real to me, even though some of the centuries-old English was challenging. 


The movie made me wish that Joseph Mankiewicz had directed more of Shakespeare's works for cinema. The balance the movie strikes is oh, so totally just right. It does not go so far into cinematic territory that we lose the work's theatricality, but travels far enough by camera that it provides a sense of seamless reality only a movie can create.  The casting was brilliant.  James Mason was at his best as Brutus, and he carries the film on h…

Booked on Sugar

Sometimes the television remote control finds the channel for Destiny. I believe I was indeed destined to see Marc Aronson'sand Marina Buddhos's presentation to students at the Brooklyn Public Library based on their recent book, SugarChanged the World. Their program certainly changed my world. While written for a youth audience, this is a book that adults will enjoy, and naturally, a great book for parents to share with their children.

I often wonder at the parallels between drug addiction and food addiction in our culture. I know I'm not alone in this. You can't miss the similarities:  "Betcha can't eat just one.  Crave the crunch. Do you dream in chocolate? Hershey chocolate is bliss."  And, as noted in my earlier posts on  Super Bowl ads, when you see a man "snorting" Dorito crumbs .... well, I rest my case.

I've also thought about how quickly we "judge" people with substance abuse problems while the US clearly suffers from foo…